<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Video Removed for Copyright Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/</link>
	<description>A little bit of everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>That is madness. I agree with you 100% . THe thing is...there needs to be clear cut definitions of what is legal and illegal in an age where technology clearly makes the ability to distribute material, digitally, never as before...good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is madness. I agree with you 100% . THe thing is&#8230;there needs to be clear cut definitions of what is legal and illegal in an age where technology clearly makes the ability to distribute material, digitally, never as before&#8230;good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-10718</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-10718</guid>
		<description>That is madness. I agree with you 100% . THe thing is...there needs to be clear cut definitions of what is legal and illegal in an age where technology clearly makes the ability to distribute material, digitally, never as before...good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is madness. I agree with you 100% . THe thing is&#8230;there needs to be clear cut definitions of what is legal and illegal in an age where technology clearly makes the ability to distribute material, digitally, never as before&#8230;good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenya</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>kenya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Jennifer, the video did contain music.  I just posted the one with no sound to see what would happen.  My original video remains down.

The dilemma for me in this is that YouTube rolled out advertising after this video was removed (and I don&#039;t participate in that).  So in theory no one was making money.  I could submit the counter notice and get the video back up but then I would be putting myself at risk of being sued.  While I&#039;m obviously not making money off the video defending myself against the corporate machine would be costly.

The ridiculous thing is that many of the videos that were removed from YouTube were acapella and karaoke videos.  Some were people talking with music in the background.  Does that mean that if I want to post such a video that I need to start making up my own songs?  And if I start shooting a video and music happens to be on in the background, do I need to tell them to turn the music off?  Because that is utterly ridiculous.

I do think that fair use needs to be defined more especially in how it relates to home videos and fans.  I&#039;m not a bootlegger and should not be treated as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer, the video did contain music.  I just posted the one with no sound to see what would happen.  My original video remains down.</p>
<p>The dilemma for me in this is that YouTube rolled out advertising after this video was removed (and I don&#8217;t participate in that).  So in theory no one was making money.  I could submit the counter notice and get the video back up but then I would be putting myself at risk of being sued.  While I&#8217;m obviously not making money off the video defending myself against the corporate machine would be costly.</p>
<p>The ridiculous thing is that many of the videos that were removed from YouTube were acapella and karaoke videos.  Some were people talking with music in the background.  Does that mean that if I want to post such a video that I need to start making up my own songs?  And if I start shooting a video and music happens to be on in the background, do I need to tell them to turn the music off?  Because that is utterly ridiculous.</p>
<p>I do think that fair use needs to be defined more especially in how it relates to home videos and fans.  I&#8217;m not a bootlegger and should not be treated as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenya</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-10717</link>
		<dc:creator>kenya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-10717</guid>
		<description>Jennifer, the video did contain music.  I just posted the one with no sound to see what would happen.  My original video remains down.

The dilemma for me in this is that YouTube rolled out advertising after this video was removed (and I don&#039;t participate in that).  So in theory no one was making money.  I could submit the counter notice and get the video back up but then I would be putting myself at risk of being sued.  While I&#039;m obviously not making money off the video defending myself against the corporate machine would be costly.

The ridiculous thing is that many of the videos that were removed from YouTube were acapella and karaoke videos.  Some were people talking with music in the background.  Does that mean that if I want to post such a video that I need to start making up my own songs?  And if I start shooting a video and music happens to be on in the background, do I need to tell them to turn the music off?  Because that is utterly ridiculous.

I do think that fair use needs to be defined more especially in how it relates to home videos and fans.  I&#039;m not a bootlegger and should not be treated as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer, the video did contain music.  I just posted the one with no sound to see what would happen.  My original video remains down.</p>
<p>The dilemma for me in this is that YouTube rolled out advertising after this video was removed (and I don&#8217;t participate in that).  So in theory no one was making money.  I could submit the counter notice and get the video back up but then I would be putting myself at risk of being sued.  While I&#8217;m obviously not making money off the video defending myself against the corporate machine would be costly.</p>
<p>The ridiculous thing is that many of the videos that were removed from YouTube were acapella and karaoke videos.  Some were people talking with music in the background.  Does that mean that if I want to post such a video that I need to start making up my own songs?  And if I start shooting a video and music happens to be on in the background, do I need to tell them to turn the music off?  Because that is utterly ridiculous.</p>
<p>I do think that fair use needs to be defined more especially in how it relates to home videos and fans.  I&#8217;m not a bootlegger and should not be treated as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>So, there was no music in the background and just lip syncing &quot;Kiss&quot; by Prince?

My only take on this is just alluding to the fact that it was Prince song implies that maybe their was music in the background and the computer notification made an error by realizing what you were doing should not have constituted a copyright infringement. However, this goes into another discussion into freedom of speech.

Shouldn&#039;t you be allowed to discuss an artist&#039;s work, lip syncing, playing around without the fear of having your youtube account taken down?!

I can understand if you had music in the background even if it was a short bit because the main issue with using youtube is that once you place a video on youtube that it is for &quot;commercial use&quot; meaning that anyone can take the video and possibly copy it and sell it for a profit.

This is where the artist loses out, the publishing company, etc.

However, the courts have to decide what is &quot;fair use&quot; because now I am not to sure of a legal definition that is right when it comes to cases that are developing right before out eyes.

Thanks for sharing your story! Adds to my understanding of all the confusion we are in.

Do that counter suit and keep us informed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, there was no music in the background and just lip syncing &#8220;Kiss&#8221; by Prince?</p>
<p>My only take on this is just alluding to the fact that it was Prince song implies that maybe their was music in the background and the computer notification made an error by realizing what you were doing should not have constituted a copyright infringement. However, this goes into another discussion into freedom of speech.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t you be allowed to discuss an artist&#8217;s work, lip syncing, playing around without the fear of having your youtube account taken down?!</p>
<p>I can understand if you had music in the background even if it was a short bit because the main issue with using youtube is that once you place a video on youtube that it is for &#8220;commercial use&#8221; meaning that anyone can take the video and possibly copy it and sell it for a profit.</p>
<p>This is where the artist loses out, the publishing company, etc.</p>
<p>However, the courts have to decide what is &#8220;fair use&#8221; because now I am not to sure of a legal definition that is right when it comes to cases that are developing right before out eyes.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your story! Adds to my understanding of all the confusion we are in.</p>
<p>Do that counter suit and keep us informed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-10716</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-10716</guid>
		<description>So, there was no music in the background and just lip syncing &quot;Kiss&quot; by Prince?

My only take on this is just alluding to the fact that it was Prince song implies that maybe their was music in the background and the computer notification made an error by realizing what you were doing should not have constituted a copyright infringement. However, this goes into another discussion into freedom of speech.

Shouldn&#039;t you be allowed to discuss an artist&#039;s work, lip syncing, playing around without the fear of having your youtube account taken down?!

I can understand if you had music in the background even if it was a short bit because the main issue with using youtube is that once you place a video on youtube that it is for &quot;commercial use&quot; meaning that anyone can take the video and possibly copy it and sell it for a profit.

This is where the artist loses out, the publishing company, etc.

However, the courts have to decide what is &quot;fair use&quot; because now I am not to sure of a legal definition that is right when it comes to cases that are developing right before out eyes.

Thanks for sharing your story! Adds to my understanding of all the confusion we are in.

Do that counter suit and keep us informed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, there was no music in the background and just lip syncing &#8220;Kiss&#8221; by Prince?</p>
<p>My only take on this is just alluding to the fact that it was Prince song implies that maybe their was music in the background and the computer notification made an error by realizing what you were doing should not have constituted a copyright infringement. However, this goes into another discussion into freedom of speech.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t you be allowed to discuss an artist&#8217;s work, lip syncing, playing around without the fear of having your youtube account taken down?!</p>
<p>I can understand if you had music in the background even if it was a short bit because the main issue with using youtube is that once you place a video on youtube that it is for &#8220;commercial use&#8221; meaning that anyone can take the video and possibly copy it and sell it for a profit.</p>
<p>This is where the artist loses out, the publishing company, etc.</p>
<p>However, the courts have to decide what is &#8220;fair use&#8221; because now I am not to sure of a legal definition that is right when it comes to cases that are developing right before out eyes.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your story! Adds to my understanding of all the confusion we are in.</p>
<p>Do that counter suit and keep us informed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daf</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>daf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>this bast*rds removed the trailer of the my own movie which i have fully rights too saying it was copyright in fragment claimed by EROS WORLDWIE LLC, &quot;I am like what the f*ck&quot; who are they? this seriously pissed me off,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this bast*rds removed the trailer of the my own movie which i have fully rights too saying it was copyright in fragment claimed by EROS WORLDWIE LLC, &#8220;I am like what the f*ck&#8221; who are they? this seriously pissed me off,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daf</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-10713</link>
		<dc:creator>daf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-10713</guid>
		<description>this bast*rds removed the trailer of the my own movie which i have fully rights too saying it was copyright in fragment claimed by EROS WORLDWIE LLC, &quot;I am like what the f*ck&quot; who are they? this seriously pissed me off,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this bast*rds removed the trailer of the my own movie which i have fully rights too saying it was copyright in fragment claimed by EROS WORLDWIE LLC, &#8220;I am like what the f*ck&#8221; who are they? this seriously pissed me off,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Anton</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>P.S. I&#039;ll be talking about this issue on Idolradio.com on Sept. 5 at 7 p.m. EST.
You can see the call-in info on my myspace.com/robertanton comment board and blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. I&#8217;ll be talking about this issue on Idolradio.com on Sept. 5 at 7 p.m. EST.<br />
You can see the call-in info on my myspace.com/robertanton comment board and blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Anton</title>
		<link>http://kenyaallmond.me/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-10710</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenya.allmond.us/2007/08/30/youtube-video-removed-for-copyright-infringement/#comment-10710</guid>
		<description>P.S. I&#039;ll be talking about this issue on Idolradio.com on Sept. 5 at 7 p.m. EST.
You can see the call-in info on my myspace.com/robertanton comment board and blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. I&#8217;ll be talking about this issue on Idolradio.com on Sept. 5 at 7 p.m. EST.<br />
You can see the call-in info on my myspace.com/robertanton comment board and blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

